English Learning Tips for ESL Learners and Classes

Here are a number of English learning tips to help you or your class improve your English. Choose a few English learning tips to get started today! Ask yourself weekly: What do I want to learn this week? Asking yourself this question every week will help you stop and think for a moment about what is most important to you. It is easy to focus only on the current unit, grammar exercise, etc. If you take a moment to stop and set a goal for yourself every week, you will notice the progress you are making and, in turn, become more inspired by how quickly you are learning English! You will be surprised at how this feeling of success will motivate you to learn even more English. Quickly review important new information shortly before going to bed. Research has shown that our brains process information that is fresh in our brains while we sleep. By shortly (this means very quickly - just a glance at what you are working on at the moment) going over some exercise, reading, etc. before you go to sleep, your brain will work away on this information while you sleep! While doing exercises and alone at home or in your room, speak English aloud. Connect the muscles of your face to the information in your head. Just as understanding the basics of tennis does not make you a great tennis player, understanding grammar rules do not mean you can automatically speak English well. You need to practice the act of speaking often. Speaking of yourself at home and reading the exercises you are doing will help connect your brain to your facial muscles and improve pronunciation and make your knowledge active. Do five to ten minutes of listening at least four times a week. In the past, I decided I needed to get fit and went jogging - usually three or four miles. Well, after not having done anything for many months, those three or four miles really hurt! Needless to say, I did not go jogging for another few months! Learning to understand spoken English well is very similar. If you decide that you going to work hard and listen for two hours, chances are that you will not do extra listening exercises any time soon. If on the other hand, you start off slowly and listen often, it will be easier to develop the habit of listening to English on a regular basis. Look for situations in which you must speak/read/listen to English This is probably the most important tip. You need to use English in a real world situation. Learning English in a classroom is important, but putting your English knowledge into practice in real situations will improve your fluency in speaking English. If you do not know of any real life situation, create new ones for yourself by using the Internet to listen to the news, write English responses in forums, exchange emails in English with email pals, etc.

Internal And External Conflict In Shutter Island - 1416 Words

Statement: For a text to be successful characters must experience internal and external conflict. In the film Shutter Island directed by Martin Scorsese, the main protagonist Teddy experiences both internal and external conflicts which he struggles to resolve as his denial of the truth prevents him from doing so. Teddy goes to the Island as a US marshal to investigate the missing patient, however, he is faced with the truth that he has suppressed for so long. Teddy creates a false reality to cope with his guilt of killing his wife as he’s unable to admit his true identity of Andrew Laeddis. Scorsese’s techniques and conventions are used to highlight the importance of characters battling internal and external conflict as it makes it a†¦show more content†¦The fire symbolises the lies he created to shield himself from the truth, he’s struggling with his external conflict as he proceeds to fabricate his reality with lies. In a close up we see him reach out to hold her in the place where he shot her, however there’s water flowing out instead of bl ood, the truth is pouring out his subconscious is trying to force him to face the truth. The place starts to turn to ash the overwhelming amount of fire furthers the illusion he’s created and destroys the memories of the truth. He’s left with the water slipping through his fingers exposes how the truth is slipping away from him as the fire engulfs him with lies. Teddy suppresses the truth as he cannot face what he has done, it is human nature to suppress things we cannot face. When we struggle to cope with certain things we find it easier to repress our problems, that way we don’t have to deal with them. Teddy conflicts are relatable for an audience as they will often experience the same thing when suppressing things and end up creating lies to help shield yourself from the truth because facing the truth can hurt which can be hard to overcome. This is why it is easier for humans to suppress things because they are able to avoid the pain. Teddy continues to struggle with the battle of internal and external conflict as he slips further into the fantasy that he created to shield him from the truthShow MoreRelatedInternal And External Conflict In Shutter Island1505 Words   |  7 Pages The film Shutter Island directed by Martin Scorsese is about a patient called Andrew â€Å"Teddy Daniels†. The film takes place in a mental institution called AshCliffe. Teddy is a patient who had killed his wife. Teddy feels extremely guilty and tries to hide the truth by creating a fantasy of his own where his wife died in an apartment fire. Scorsese uses Teddy’s internal and external conflict to make the film successful by showing the idea that: It is human nature to suppress things we cannot face

Fvgdf Essay Example For Students

Fvgdf Essay It is easy to confuse the concepts of virtual reality and a computerized model of reality (simulation). The former is a self-contained Universe, replete with its laws of physics and logic. It can bear resemblance to the real world or not. It can be consistent or not. It can interact with the real world or not. In short, it is an arbitrary environment. In contrast, a model of reality must have a direct and strong relationship to the world. It must obey the rules of physics and of logic. The absence of such a relationship renders it meaningless. A flight simulator is not much good in a world without aeroplanes or if it ignores the laws of nature. A technical analysis program is useless without a stock exchange or if its mathematically erroneous. Yet, the two concepts are often confused because they are both mediated by and reside on computers. The computer is a self-contained (though not closed) Universe. It incorporates the hardware, the data and the instructions for the manipulation of the data (software). It is, therefore, by definition, a virtual reality. It is versatile and can correlate its reality with the world outside. But it can also refrain from doing so. This is the ominous what if in artificial intelligence (AI). What if a computer were to refuse to correlate its internal (virtual) reality with the reality of its makers? What if it were to impose its own reality on us and make it the privileged one? In the visually tantalizing movie, The Matrix, a breed of AI computers takes over the world. It harvests human embryos in laboratories called fields. It then feeds them through grim looking tubes and keeps them immersed in gelatinous liquid in cocoons. This new machine species derives its energy needs from the electricity produced by the billions of human bodies thus preserved. A sophisticated, all-pervasive, computer program called The Matrix generates a world inhabited by the consciousness of the unfortunate human batteries. Ensconced in their shells, t hey see themselves walking, talking, working and making love. This is a tangible and olfactory phantasm masterfully created by the Matrix. Its computing power is mind boggling. It generates the minutest details and reams of data in a spectacularly successful effort to maintain the illusion. A group of human miscreants succeeds to learn the secret of the Matrix. They form an underground and live aboard a ship, loosely communicating with a halcyon city called Zion, the last bastion of resistance. In one of the scenes, Cypher, one of the rebels defects. Over a glass of (illusory) rubicund wine and (spectral) juicy steak, he poses the main dilemma of the movie. Is it better to live happily in a perfectly detailed delusion or to survive unhappily but free of its hold? The Matrix controls the minds of all the humans in the world. It is a bridge between them, they inter-connected through it. It makes them share the same sights, smells and textures. They remember. They compete. They make d ecisions. The Matrix is sufficiently complex to allow for this apparent lack of determinism and ubiquity of free will. The root question is: is there any difference between making decisions and feeling certain of making them (not having made them)? If one is unaware of the existence of the Matrix, the answer is no. From the inside, as a part of the Matrix, making decisions and appearing to be making them are identical states. Only an outside observer one who in possession of full information regarding both the Matrix and the humans can tell the difference. Moreover, if the Matrix were a computer program of infinite complexity, no observer (finite or infinite) would have been able to say with any certainty whose a decision was the Matrixs or the humans. And because the Matrix, for all intents and purposes, is infinite compared to the mind of any single, tube-nourished, individual it is safe to say that the states of making a decision and appearing to be making a decision are subj ectively indistinguishable. No individual within the Matrix would be able to tell the difference. His or her life would seem to him or her as real as ours are to us. The Matrix may be deterministic but this determinism is inaccessible to individual minds because of the complexity involved. When faced with a trillion deterministic paths, one would be justified to feel that he exercised free, unconstrained will in choosing one of them. Free will and determinism are indistinguishable at a certain level of complexity. Yet, we KNOW that the Matrix is different to our world. It is NOT the same. This is an intuitive kind of knowledge, for sure, but this does not detract from its firmness. If there is no subjective difference between the Matrix and our Universe, there must be an objective one. Another key sentence is uttered by Morpheus, the leader of the rebels. He says to The Chosen One (the Messiah) that it is really the year 2199, though the Matrix gives the impression that it is 1999. This is where the Matrix and reality diverge. Though a human who would experience both would find them indistinguishable objectively they are different. In one of them (the Matrix), people have no objective TIME (though the Matrix might have it). The other (reality) is governed by it. Under the spell of the Matrix, people feel as though time goes by. They have functioning watches. The sun rises and sets. Seasons change. They grow old and die. This is not entirely an illusion. Their bodies do decay and die, as ours do. They are not exempt from the laws of nature. But their AWARENESS of time is computer generated. The Matrix is sufficiently sophisticated and knowledgeable to maintain a close correlation between the physical state of the human (his health and age) and his consciousness of the passage of time. The basic rules of time for instance, its asymmetry are part of the program. But this is precisely it. Time in the minds of these people is program-generated, not reality-indu ced. It is not the derivative of change and irreversible (thermodynamic and other) processes OUT THERE. Their minds are part of a computer program and the computer program is a part of their minds. Their bodies are static, degenerating in their protective nests. Nothing happens to them except in their minds. They have no physical effect on the world. They effect no change. These things set the Matrix and reality apart. To qualify as reality a two-way interaction must occur. One flow of data is when reality influences the minds of people (as does the Matrix). The obverse, but equally necessary, type of data flow is when people know reality and influence it. The Matrix triggers a time sensation in people the same way that the Universe triggers a time sensation in us. Something does happen OUT THERE and it is called the Matrix. In this sense, the Matrix is real, it is the reality of these humans. It maintains the requirement of the first type of flow of data. But it fails the second te st: people do not know that it exists or any of its attributes, nor do they affect it irreversibly. They do not change the Matrix. Paradoxically, the rebels do affect the Matrix (they almost destroy it). In doing so, they make it REAL. It is their REALITY because they KNOW it and they irreversibly CHANGE it. Applying this dual-track test, virtual reality IS a reality, albeit, at this stage, of a deterministic type. It affects our minds, we know that it exists and we affect it in return. Our choices and actions irreversibly alter the state of the system. This altered state, in turn, affects our minds. This interaction IS what we call reality. With the advent of stochastic and quantum virtual reality generators the distinction between real and virtual will fade. The Matrix thus is not impossible. But that it is possible does not make it real. Bibliography: .ud4c17f0ccee2105b6c11678f8c390e20 , .ud4c17f0ccee2105b6c11678f8c390e20 .postImageUrl , .ud4c17f0ccee2105b6c11678f8c390e20 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ud4c17f0ccee2105b6c11678f8c390e20 , .ud4c17f0ccee2105b6c11678f8c390e20:hover , .ud4c17f0ccee2105b6c11678f8c390e20:visited , .ud4c17f0ccee2105b6c11678f8c390e20:active { border:0!important; } .ud4c17f0ccee2105b6c11678f8c390e20 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ud4c17f0ccee2105b6c11678f8c390e20 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ud4c17f0ccee2105b6c11678f8c390e20:active , .ud4c17f0ccee2105b6c11678f8c390e20:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ud4c17f0ccee2105b6c11678f8c390e20 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ud4c17f0ccee2105b6c11678f8c390e20 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ud4c17f0ccee2105b6c11678f8c390e20 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ud4c17f0ccee2105b6c11678f8c390e20 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ud4c17f0ccee2105b6c11678f8c390e20:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ud4c17f0ccee2105b6c11678f8c390e20 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ud4c17f0ccee2105b6c11678f8c390e20 .ud4c17f0ccee2105b6c11678f8c390e20-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ud4c17f0ccee2105b6c11678f8c390e20:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Hurricane Iniki Essay